Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>> The patent exemplifies a growing trend among technology and consumer firms to anticipate consumers’ needs, even before consumers do.

Wrong. The patent exemplifies a growing trend among technology and consumer firms to think their business processes ought to be protected by patents when in fact, no such need exists. Certainly there is no wider (public, society, industry) good from allowing rich companies to patent something many others may have easily figured out independently.



But there is absolutely a need for these companies to assemble patent war chests; otherwise they are vulnerable to other people who have them.

Or even other people who just have 1 single patent for something they want to do.

So don't blame the companies, they are acting rationally; blame the system.


Do you have any evidence that Amazon intends to use this patent purely for defensive reasons only? If not, we're just speculating. Worse, we're giving them the benefit of doubt.


Offense is the best defense, so this is a red herring.

The fact is, voters have set up a dog-eat-dog system. Now you complain because the dogs eat or get eaten.


Why does exemplifying one preclude exemplifying the other?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: