Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In general, yes. I believe there's a difference between writing a performance review based on your memory/notes of how someone was doing 6 months ago vs getting into the weeds of a sample of PRs/specs and reviewing those from a performance viewpoint.


For sure. It's why review should be as continuous as anything one wants to improve. Annual review is a relic from the gold watch era.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: