My guess, the article itself is clearly AI authored and there are a fair number of us who don't particularly like the writing style. Further, it implies something about the original human's own valuation of this work - if they decided to let the machine handle it, why should I spend my own time reading what they didn't bother to write?
I don't like AI slop either, but we're both non-natives, so we did a run of AI after initial draft for the reader's comfort. We'll try to improve on the style
