Are those real example questions? Cause I stackoverflow program a fair share, but those seem a little bit low level for any language, and if you google those for Rust, I end up with the docs for Vec and Iterator, which contain exactly the reverse and sum methods. And this isn't some case of "fuck you read the entire docs", the methods contain extensive built in examples (copypasted from their respective method docs):
let mut v = [1, 2, 3];
v.reverse();
assert!(v == [3, 2, 1]);
let a = [1, 2, 3];
let sum: i32 = a.iter().sum();
assert_eq!(sum, 6);
I'm not saying everything is simple, and there are hard parts of rust to learn. But as far as solving simple problems, I haven't ever had an easier time then with Rust.
No, they were just off the top of my head, not to be taken literally.
And the docs aren't organized as a tutorial. If I don't know what a method or type does, or even that it exists, I'm not going to know to look there for examples.
Ok fair enough. Those two examples though are specifically not good examples, and its hard to improve documentation without specific examples of what is missing.
